Fictive
Arcanum
By Don
Webb
Many modern occult
either base their mission on, or at least have a great deal of supernatural
fiction in their reading lists. It is not uncommon to see modern occultists
perusing the works of Lovecraft, Chambers, Machen, or Blackwood. This
practice leads us to two interested and related questions. Why would
a magician (Machen, Blackwood, Fortune) write fiction (beyond the
obvious reasons of amusement and remuneration)? Why would other magicians
find their inspiration in fictive works? A third question hidden in
the first tow is how is magic similar to the acts of reading and writing?
I would like to take a look at the nature of magic as a communication
system, answer the first two questions, give a few references for
where important magical writing may be found today, and sound a warning
call for its protection. This is a tiny rivulet, which I hope that
others will take up as a new type of criticism. Like the dark streams
that have never seen the light of the sun in the hills west of Arkham,
I hope that this little rivulet may play an important role in the
evolution of Life.
Mauss and other
modernists attempted to reduce the power of magic to a sociological
context -- the power of magic is equivalent to how society feels about
the magician. This dreary attitude is still largely present in popular
culture; however postmodern theorists such as van Baal, Grambo, Flowers,
and Tambiah have provided us with a semiotic theory of magic; which
serves to illustrate both the practice of magic and its symbolic expression.
Basically the semiotic theory of magic is that man is able to effect
communication with his universe, and to think ascriptively (i.e. hidden
meaning is ascribed to the phenomenon of the universe and it becomes
a partner in communication). The semiotic theory postulates three
elements the magician seeking either a change a psychological change
within him/herself or an environmental change, the message which is
cast in the form of cultural coded symbols, and the hidden "other
side" of the universe. This goes beyond Frazier's notions of
"sympathy' by actually elaborating not only a three fold process
of sender-message-receiver but actually proposes a willed volition
to receive communication (in either the form of a revelation or an
environmental change) back from the universe. Summing up this model
of magic (after Flowers, Runes and Magic: Magical Formulaic Elements
in the Older Runic Tradition, Lang, 1986 pg.17):
Subject --------> Direct Object ------->Indirect Object
(Man) (Symbol-symbolized) (Other reality)
|
|
V
Indirect Object <---- (Phenomenon) <------- subject
This model suggests
that for the magician the great secret is finding the correct mode
of address -- that method of communication which will produce the
response from the hidden realm. This has always been intuited in the
Mediterranean school of magic, as exemplified by choosing Hermes,
god of communication as its patron. For the magician operating in
a traditional society the method of communication is generally heavily
determined -- people know how to talk to the gods. But in modern and
postmodern societies the quest for the method of communication is
ongoing. The book ranks high as a sufficiently mysterious form of
communication (video, movies, and the computer network are waiting
in the wings). Who among us has not had that mysterious phenomena
of having gleaned something from one's own writings long after it
was written? And who among us has not had that mysterious process
of "finding just the book we need" at a crucial time in
our thought? So keeping in mind your own experiences of the mystery
of the written word consider van Baal's description of the nature
of a magical spell:
"The formula
takes its origin from the discourse between man and his universe,
in the case of a particular formula a discourse concerning a certain
object and the fulfillment of a desire. In this discourse man feels
addressed or singled out by his universe and he endeavors to address
it in turn trying to discover the kind of address to which his universe
will be willing to answer, that is, willing to show itself communicable.
The formulas he finally discovers in answer to his quest is not
really man's discovery but a gift of a revelation bestowed upon
him by the universe. The formula is the outcome of an act of communication
in which man's universe reveals to him the secret of how it should
be addressed in this or that circumstance, a secret which is at
the same time a revelation of its hidden essence in that particular
field. . . "
(J. van Baal Symbols
for Communication: an introduction to the anthropological study
of religion {Studies of developing Countries 11) Asen: Van Gorrcum
1971 pg. 263)
Given the above
why do magicians write fiction? Not as open communication of magic,
it would be easier simply to write how-to books. The need to communicate
with the hidden aspects of the universe of discourse is the magician's
motive. Just as an Egyptian would stuff his letters to the dead in
the crumbling tomb walls, the modern magician sends his or her message
into the semiosphere. Dion Fortune didn't create her novels just as
entertainment, but to actively Work the magic. By performing illustrative
magic concerning the nature of initiation, of secret schools, etc.,
she actually received (from the Hidden parts of her own psyche) such
information. The simple act of visualization (i.e. daydreaming) is
known to produce effects both psychological and environmental, so
how much greater an effect can be obtained thought the writing and
publishing of magical work? The precision of writing, editing, and
rewriting coupled with the aching wait for publication (with its inherent
travails of lost MSS, marketing mistakes, fraudulent publishers) creates
an unbeatable combination of passion and precision. These are the
elements that effect any magical working. It is easy to get up passion
for a particular end. We have all that experience of having to get
that job, make that meeting, etc. wherein our magical practice did
pay off with the required miracle. But it is frankly hard to work
up the passion required to get at certain desired spiritual states.
However the test of publication will place the magician in the desire
filled mode necessary to achieve his or her spiritual goals. Of particular
interest in this model is a man who would have been repelled at the
mere notion of placing him among magicians, H. P. Lovecraft. But he
illustrates the case perfectly. Lovecraft, with his passions for astronomy
and history longed to be part of the vast forces of time. He longed
to see the hidden essence of history/cosmology that he felt would
dissolve the details of the present like an acid. With an entirely
materialistic outlook, the practice of magic would've been absurd
-- but writing was another matter. His themes and topics were certainly
not commercial (although there has been a good deal of money minted
in his name). The desire to continue producing amateur fiction, or
sticking with such fiction as could be only sold to the low paying
Weird Tales, show that his need was a purely magical one. And it produced
results. The plots of his stories often came to him in dreams. Particularly
noteworthy was the dream that led to the production of the prose-poem
"Nyarlathotep" in which he found the Hermes of his pantheon.
This particular communicator forms the other side, with his swarthy
Egyptian skin, and resembles both the figure of Hermes-Toth and the
preternatural entity that Crowley contacted in 1904. Lovecraft knew
his need for the cosmic feeling his stories brought him, and throughout
his letters and critical writings we see that need to evoke a mood
repeated time and time again. In fact Lovecraft was sensitive enough
to this process (despite the fact his materialist attitude kept him
from ever consciously expressing it) that many of his stories are
about the desired result of receiving communication from the other
side. Cthulhu sends dreams. The Fungi from Yuggoth takes the seeker
away on a cosmic quest, or at the very least whispers all the secrets
of the cosmos via certain human appendages. The primordial ones communicate
through their vast murals found in hidden Antarctica. In the most
revelatory of all his work, "The Shadow out of Time," the
hero not only sends a message to the other side (by actually writing
in the library of the Great Race), but actually receives a revelation
of finding the message deep below ground (i.e. in the unconscious)
written in his own hand .
Now having seen
why magicians have a need to use certain hidden or encoded communications
such as fiction writing, we turn to the question of why magicians
need to read fiction. The simple reason of "inspiration' suffices,
but it is to be noted that it is not the same sort of inspiration
that one may glean from say a straightforward biography. Very little
occult fiction provides a step by step account of ritual procedure,
and those that do are amongst the most boring. One doesn't read "The
White People" to find out the step by step ways of doing anything.
Indeed the operant material is generally described under only the
broadest (and therefore most evocative) of terms. One may be tempted
to invent the Aklo language or script out the Mao game, but the actual
use of occult literature is to allow the magician to receive communication
from the "Other side." By the use of imagination and mood,
the nature of that hidden realm is disclosed to us; although most
often in a mysterious way. It would be difficult to provide a description
of the shudder that hearing the caldron spell from Macbeth first gave
us. Crowley choose Macbeth, The Tempest, and Midsummer Night's Dream
for the reading list of the A.'. A.'. "as being interesting for
the traditions treated." The objective reality of these traditions
were very small, but Crowley (nobody's fool) knew that the effect
they had on the soul allowed something of that mysterious realm to
be communicated. In short, reading works which actually illustrate
magic close the diagram above, and enable the discerning magician
to benefit from the others illustrative work. This is not the simple
receiving of a message from the author, that simple act of decoding
which we all do as readers -- this is receiving a place of access
to the Unknown from the Unknown. The magician who manages both this
feat and the act of fictional creation therefore achieves in this
postmodern society a sets of signs and symbols for communication with
that unknown realm.
The question facing
the modern occultist is where the unknown is most active, or to put
it in literary terms, where are the new occult writers coming from,
and in what arenas may they be found. As this quest has to be an intensely
personal one, I can only give a few hints and recommendations. The
works of Thomas Liggoti are universally praiseworthy and should be
sought out. J. G. Ballard, who never once mentions anything overtly
magical, is great place to learn about stasis and rebirth. Cities
of the Red Night by William S. Burroughs with its masterful portrayal
of the chthonic forces should be on every magician's library, and
the magical realism of Jorge Luis Borges and Garcia Marquez is not
to be overlooked. The late Fritz Leiber is likewise a place where
a thing or two can be learned. As for current magazines: Elegia /
3116 Porter Lane/ Ventura Ca 93003 provides a fairly high understanding
of the magical process cast in the current Gothic idiom.
If you desire to
be part of this process, you must create, and you must preserve by
fighting off every attempt to suppress supernatural literature. The
forces that produced writer's block within the self have their counterparts
in the semiosphere. These mindless gray ones who take books off of
school shelves. If you are a knight that seeks the Grail of inspiration,
or the magician who creates its brew -- beware those gray dragons
with dull eyes. There is no compromise with those who would limit
our imagination, to set back and allow them control of our libraries
is a spiritual negligence that will take its toll on our hearts. Read!
Write! Preserve!
(c) Copyright 1995.
Used with permission of the Author.